11:08

There’s going to be some more stuff in this close to midnight hour. But I’ve got a project I’m working on. I think I’ll come back to this….thanks for coming by.

10:58

Everett was slinging when I was growing up in and around the city. (There really is no good way to do these types of interviews.)  

Dyson deals with the skin tone thing I’ve been seeing the whole show. I wonder whether we’ve been set up for this? Whether the editor has been playing this up…placing certain interviews in the show and leaving others on the cutting room floor. 

10:53

I saw this last night. If you control for everything external (except skin shade), and you get different outcomes, then where does the outcome emanate from? must be differences in character right? has to be the individual choices right? the strength of individual stories is that it provides weight and heft to statistical analysis. But the problem here is that you can’t scale those individual stories up. Meaning that if John John is failing because he’s a knucklehead we can’t say that the reason black men fail is because we tend to be knuckleheads. 

Big ups to Detroit! (had to get that in there…)

10:41

Quick pitch–Stare in the Darkness: Rap, Hip-hop and Black Politics. Coming soon.

Romantic story about rap. Rap was a voice for the disenfranchised. Becomes corrupted. Yes. But it’s been deeply patriarchal for more than a minute. 

There’s been an explosion of hip-hop pedagogy. We’ve probably underestimated the power of hip-hop here SIGNIFICANTLY. 

Segue to Dyson. Who blames the division within hip-hop squarely on white executives.

So that’s what Lupe Fiasco sounds like. Simmons argues that MCs are the voice, STILL, of the ghettoes. Nope. They are A voice.

Concluding? Back to the twin study. Mike Dyson and his (darker skinned) older brother. In the joint for murder. I’ve seen this part before. Again, choices choices choices. 

10:32

Now this is an area that I have a great deal of expertise in. The reason I have harped so much on the responsibility meme tossed around by Obama is because the responsibility idea is attached to these negative images of black men and women, and this in turn leads to calls for much more social control. Understand that this IS big government. Conservatives don’t want smaller government as much as they want government to do less of what they dislike and more of what they do–which in this case means a bigger social control apparatus. More resources to keep folks in jail. 

Spike. 

He’s taken an interesting journey. Talk about curmudgeon. 

Jonathan Phillips is affecting an accent that makes him appear much less…connected to black people than perhaps he is. I talked to him last year…and he’s decidedly conservative. But his voice is less nasal. Just saying.

Spike blames the media for helping to promote images of rappers and ballers to black america. Again the role modeling right? Again I understand this. The attitudinal research points to this. But there is much more to it THAN this.  

10:20

I’ve got to say for the record that the last time someone told me I was “trying to be white” was a bit after high school when a kid I went to high school with ran into me at the movies. “You WAS always trying to be white.” I laughed at/with him and moved on. 

Malcolm. Ironic.

All I know are “successful” black men and women who were “typically” black at Michigan. Malcolm’s experience at Maryland is something I am familiar with–there were men and women at Michigan who didn’t hang out with black people for whatever reason. But there’s a blithe connection being made here between success and eschewing blackness that I can’t quite roll with. Blackness now has a cache particularly in the advertising world that extends globally. The series of questions that Soledad can ask about THESE circumstances would be much more interesting than the ones she asks about an outlier like Malcolm. What types of blackness are commodified? It would’ve been interesting to talk to an MC here.

Next up. Spike.

10:08

Here we go. Starting out with a birthday party where the father is absent. Brandon has two children he isn’t taking responsibility for. Brandon walks in late. (What’s Brandon’s skin shade? You guessed it.) And we’ve got the setup. Why does he not take care of his children? Generational curse. Four generations deep. His grandfather (?) has ten children that he didn’t take care of. Amazing.

Ron Mincy is the social scientist bringing up the rear here–Roland Fryer doesn’t deal with this either. For Mincy we’ve given women the ability to raise children without men, and the structural issues don’t help.  

One of Brandon’s “baby mamas” is now pregnant with twins from another man.

Quick cut to another ’68 graduate (Kenneth Talley) who is doing the right thing. Why? Role models. Again. He had a middle class family with a father, not like those who probably aren’t fathers because they didn’t HAVE fathers. 

It’s actually Talley that I’m interested in and families like them. We don’t know enough about him. Not necessarily what separates him from the hardcore and damaged. But what connects him. Not in some crass genetic sense. 

Next up? Being black in corporate America. Yet another light-skinned success story. And my boy just hipped me to the fact that this one doesn’t “sound black” either.

9:58

“Things that are stereotypically black.” I sense a Roland Fryer moment. Yep. He’s got a piece of research (hasn’t been published…and that’s important) that seeks to prove that “acting white” is a real phenomenon rather than something madeup in our collective heads….

I had no idea San Quentin was so packed….

Chris is a San Quentin inmate, who says that if he’d had positive role models he wouldn’t be in the joint. Nothing like those individual stories right? Even Ellis Cose who starts out talking about structural issues, ends up going back to role models and psychological messages. “Education is not really a black thing.” And this is why Chris is in San Quentin. “It took me to come to prison to see somebody going to school and say ‘that’s what I want to do.’”

Next up the biggie.

Where are the fathers?

9:57

Who the hell is this poet?

9:53

Another black boy (Braylon) having to live with poor choices. A black kid really. He doesn’t only have his own choices to live with, but the way the bit is played, he’s living with the choices of his grandfather too…who was a pimp, player, hustler AND one of the Little Rock class of ’68. Choices again.

9:46

The assistant D.A. One of only two black district attorneys in the county. He’s putting heads to bed each and every day. Part of the system. 

Cut to Los Angeles and D.L. Hughley. Didn’t know he used to bang. They use him as the black male voice of reason to talk about the “real” black experience with the police. Now here I put it in quotes because this is another example where a bit more nuance is required.

(What does “inherently sometimes unfair” mean?)

(Have they shown a dark skinned black man who isn’t dealing with hard times?) 

9:34

Back to Butch. I’m just noticing now there is one difference–Butch is lighter skinned than Kenneth is. His bio reads like that of a race man. Starts a construction company, makes a career move to teach kids. And is now living the Huxtable life. Three successful black sons…but here’s where the race man and Huxtable thing gets flipped. He was criticized for “raising his kids white.” And now each of them is involved with a white woman, while the Warrens live in a 6,000 square foot home in a tony white suburb.  

It ends with yet another social experiment. Warren’s middle son ends up shooting someone in what appears to be a drug dispute, while his older brother is the DA.

This is basically the racial twin study. What’s the implication? 

9:23

Kenneth is one of those statistics. He’s a pastor, so he’s gotten his life together, but at the same time he has no relationship with his daughter (who herself has two young children). (An African dialect? Not a language?) 

Another social scientist….a woman who studied the racial differences in employment opportunities. Interesting research but we know where it’s going right? “Being black in America is the equivalent of having a felony conviction.” Now that’s a quote. 

Next we meet Corey. Has all the skills necessary to be employed. Not necessarily well employed, but employed. Gets an interview…then promptly gets the runaround–which we know because CNN places a camera on him and we see him getting played. Because he’s got a wife and two daughters, he’s got to hustle. I saw The Pursuit of Happiness…against my will. What Will Smith was hustling for in that movie? This is what Corey is hustling for here. 

He’s an excellent example for me of someone who hasn’t quite done everything right, but given where he is, he’s doing SOMETHING. And it’s hard to see how he’s going to get ahead. The best thing he can do is somehow get stable. No mobility here.

9:17

Roland doesn’t really study crack use, though he’s familiar with the dynamics because his family was in the game. So he does nothing more here at first than serve up expert filler. The heft is left to Joseph Phillips (prominent black actor and conservative). His line is easy–black men in jail for drug crimes should be there. 

Back to Kenneth’s personal story. Again because of his choices (his CHOICES) he’s dealing with a hard ass life. He gets out of the joint as soon as the crack epidemic hits. Given that he’s already used coke and heroin what else? Yessir. Crack. “The greatest high I’ve ever felt. Better than sex.” 

9:13

Choices choices choices. Because Kenneth the pastor was angry at the world, he decided to go to the military. While in the military he got addicted to cocaine, heroin, whatever he could. When he came back? Turned to a life of crime. By the time she gets to the prison stats, we’re mired in Kenneth’s individual story. And Kenneth of course takes responsibility for it, blaming his crime on his own anger against racism.

Here comes Roland Fryer. 

9:05

Starting out with Little Rock…and then moving into a neat social experiment of sorts. Take two black men from the same place. One ends up an associate superintendent, one ends up a pastor, but only after being addicted to crack and having to fight that battle. Uses the charged memory of King’s assassination as a place marker. Differentiating the time before that moment, where blacks looked as if they were going forward (ever forward), and the time after. By taking two men from the same place, and then charting the different spaces they live in NOW they are able to in effect hold everything else constant. I think I know where this is going but I’m going to hold off a bit. 

8:56

Barkley is an excellent sports commentator…now. He’s got a good groove going with Ernie and Kenny, and has moved from the buffoon to a humorous but insightful curmudgeon. But he comes out of the gate throwing out stats that are off (there aren’t more black men in the joint than in college), terms that are off (there is no black on black crime…there is only crime, and given segregation I’m not sure what else we would expect), and analysis that is off (self-esteem isn’t our central problem, and the line in the sand language conjures up images of war. war against who?). 

excellent start. yeah right.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

11:57

Ends with a discussion about relationship options. One thing that’s important to consider here is Kriss Turner would be in no danger of falling into poverty if she decides to have children without getting married. Related is the fact that the number of single parents are exploding in part because the Spence five children model is going the way of the dodo bird. Black married couples are postponing children and are having far fewer children than they once did.

11:45

I didn’t  catch this before, but see how Noguera was silenced by the Kennedy child? Who is now about to be homeless? And she asks the questions NOW…how long before he loses the light? Fryer agrees with Noguera as well…but this is where we are, right? Here’s my question. If fryer’s program doesn’t work, then what does he try next? what range of solutions is he willing to consider?

That’s two questions.

Here’s a third. How much you want to bet he gets a slice of that cell phone market?

11:31

Evil is real. Isn’t that the truth. Dyson has given shout outs to his brother Everett in his book. This is the first time I’ve seen him…didn’t know why he was in. Choices. Choices. Choices.

Tracy Burch got a hold of data from Georgia prisons. They actually categorized prisoners by skin shade. The results are more or less what you might expect, but the type of intra-racial politics that are implicated here aren’t really dealt with.

The juxtaposition between the stories and the headlines at the bottom are fairly jarring. (Why is Aaron Spelling’s widow getting press? And why is she spending 47 million on a condo?)

10:59

concludes going back to the rands, with a shoutout to mike dyson (with a brother in for life)…..

10:51

Crime in Baltimore. I was just talking with Submariner about the stress of working in trauma in Baltimore. The VIP program sounds like a program I heard about on SmartCity–a program designed to end open air drug dealing by taking the dealers, compiling a case against them that’s air tight, then threatening to take the case to trial unless the dealer gets their life together. The police department then has a liason helping them get jobs, training, etc. The VIP program is an excellent start. And Dr. Cooper is doing all he can here.

Choices. Choices. Choices.

10:40

5% of the entire population of DC is infected? You’ve got to be kidding me. And here is the down-low again…or at least its implicated in Marvelyn’s story. The solution? Again individual education. And with a brief examination of the black church then a move to a woman (Niya) who “has a boyfriend she doesn’t quite trust.”

“Has Niya’s test taught her anything?”

Rucker Johnson takes this back to the prison industrial complex. Or even bringing in the political economy of sex in communities where black men have a choice of several “sellers” and the sellers have to compete over a limited number of buyers. This stuff is social science, but it can be told in a way that makes sense and resonates. We need much more of us doing this work, speaking to this work.

10:37
If I had the swing vote? I’d hold out for loot abstain.

There is a lot of potential in this story. Given the existence of youtube and the like I wonder if a better version could be done virtually? Kind of a smartmob joint? Some real scholarship, some real stories about black families?

10:31
My man Fryer again. Identity is fluid and contextual…or at least will be for the babies of the couple identified in this section. I’m surprised that Soledad doesn’t identify herself here. there is a big difference between how ryan lived and how the rasmussen kids will live.

the next subject? sounds like aids.

10:18
this segment on powerful black single women hits hard. 1 million more black women working. twice as many black women in college in black men. I’d be interested in knowing what they’re leaving on the cutting floor. I’ve been telling women what Chris Rock told Kriss Turner for a lonnggg time. The numbers don’t work.

10:12
“When you’re married to someone you can’t just leave that easy…”
Nice juxtaposition with the married couple who–and note that we don’t know what their economic circumstances are–appears to be doing well, with ira johnson. If she just would’ve married her man, e’erythang would’ve been SKRAIGHT.

10:06
Ira Johnson has got a great outlook on life. But she’s literally walking on a tightrope right? Now if she gets the five kids taken care of and they can do the thing, then they’ll all look out for her. But the question of course is can she?

Whoopi says it. THANK GOD FOR THE WELFARE SYSTEM. So where would she be now without that? (Ok. She looked young as hell in that picture.) If you are born in poverty you are likely to….

Avis!!!!

Sorry. Avis and her husband are friends of mine. Always good to see folks I know working. Let’s me know I’ve got options if things don’t work out…..

Um. How do we get from a nice discussion of how government can help, to marrying baby daddys and baby mommas?

9:55
The big question. Was arguing (again) about the father responsibility thing.

AH. Now we see how the Smith family did the thing. The Smiths have their own construction business, began by their father.

The church. Can’t do a show about the black family without dealing with the church. You can’t tell me that Johnson isn’t doing a yeoman’s job. Two jobs, hustling, hustling, and hustling again to take care of five children. The phone vs. the lights? Taking care of the kids’ desires or their needs? Then the stats. Today 70% of black families are headed by black families.

Here’s Rolypoly Roland Martin, switching cause and effect again. With TD Jakes bringing up the rear. Soledad neatly takes their arguments and then applies them to Johnson, who of course agrees. “I was young and wanted to have fun.” When Soledad asks them why she didn’t marry the father of her children, she says she was depressed.

Which goes back to health disparities. But not in this show.

9:50
She ends the segment talking about the geography of health disparities. Spends way too much time talking about salt and hypertension, and not enough (again) talking about the types of structural issues that determine where good grocery stores are located. When I lived in Saint Louis I lived within walking distance of three good grocery stores. The entire Northside of the city had one or two.

9:47
Here we go. He says this is a theory that’s out there, but he created the theory. The doctors are right here…but note again that Fryer is the standard, and he is given the bulk of the time. Soledad asks him about political correctness, and he counters by noting that he doesn’t care about rubbing people the wrong way. But it isn’t about rubbing people the wrong way. It’s about what the data says….

9:44
The poet talks about salt and pork, implying that our diet doesn’t help. While he’s on point, our diet doesn’t have anything to do with cancer. Ah. Here’s Fryer again. Bet he uses the salt thesis.

9:37
The Kennedy family knows how to make lemonade out of lemons. Interesting they chose the single father family, throwing things for a bit of a loop. The young son uses some of his money to help dad pay bills? But going back to Fryer, with Soledad asking a question about the distinction between middle class and lower class educational outcomes, note again that the default is cultural. “The middle class family can see the results of education all around them, where the poor family can’t?” How about the differences between quality schools? When Pedro Noguera comes in he’s the critic. He says what we know to be true—that poverty is key here—but he’s almost in there as an objective “this is the other side” analysis.

9:30
Still waiting.

9:27
So the last thing I hear before the storm kicks in and the signal goes out is Fryer talking about how he acknowledges that there are other things going on–like teacher quality–but this is one thing that can help reduce the gap between black and white students. I’m not too sure about that. Again we need more time here to be able to know exactly what the achievement slope looks like over time. Are the increases stable? Do they decrease overtime, indicating diminished returns? If we look at these changes and then plot them against school quality do some schools perform better? Do some perform worse?

9:23
I thought the metric was grades, but the metric is those assessments. They know how much money they have. Would be dope for them to combine this with some sort of financial planning program. The principal talks about progress and accountability, and she’s absolutely right about how children are penalized but there are no rewards. Fryer is adding the carrot to the stick approach. (damn a thunderstorm just jacked the signal…..)

9:16
References the achievement gap…and here is Fryer, touting the money solution. I’ve got some problems with embedding the market into education. it seems from looking at the school, that there’s another problem. One of the ways in which our processes of using government have flipped is that we now take for granted that successes should be rewarded, while failures should be allowed to sink. No Child Left Behind operates on this premise, as do literally dozens of other programs. And lest we blame this on Bush, many of Clinton’s programs were based on the same philosophy. It looks at least from the outset that the school that Fryer is dealing with may be situated in the “inner city” but it doesn’t look like an “inner city school.” Meaning that the children here who succeed and get paid are likely kids who would succeed (and get paid) anyway. I wonder what the numbers look like?

9:12
from the glories of slavery to the problems of education. can’t find a better poster child than brandon. saggy pants. cornrows. no t-shirt. and then the glorious moment when he actually gets in school. i’m reminded of a scene in the wire–fourth season–where it’s clear that administrators need numbers and need folks counted only up to a certain point. then they stop counting. but the rands got into the magnet school. for them? the difference goes straight back to the parents.

9:07
kissing cousins. isn’t that special? and the word progress. multicultural families are the present…and as sister rand says “a kodak moment.” begins with slavery but ends with a nice omniamerican moment. now i don’t particularly buy the argument that black people suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder from slavery. there is no genetic pathway that can explain this. i also think we can explain the issues related to the black family by a set of modern structural issues….but we also know that slavery took a serious toll on black families. that’s just glossed over here.

next up? roland fryer. this should be interesting.

The family reunion is a black family tradition, and Atlanta is viewed as the capital of black America. Nice touch. The black male show is tomorrow…but given that you can’t have a family as large as the one studied without men, the family had to come from somewhere. Bring in the illicit slavery era black woman white male relationship.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

    

Niara and Grandma Tootsie, originally uploaded by Unbowed.

My paternal grandmother passed away last fall. Her birthday would have been today. Here she is with my daughter whose birthday is on Sunday. I thought about her when I heard about Rene Marie.

Click here to view the embedded video.

And thinking about Marie brought me back here:

Click here to view the embedded video.

My grandmother and grandfather were able to raise close to a dozen of my grandfather’s brothers and sisters after their parents unexpectedly passed. Throughout their trials and tribulations they remained steadfast, and dedicated to their family. They represented at their best a model of excellence that we should all hope to attain.

By taking the lyrics of the Negro National Anthem and combining them with the instrumental of the Star-Spangled Banner what she did was bring out the best of both. But you had to be awake to hear it.

Gaye did pretty much the same thing, bringing a level of soul and depth to his rendition that was so powerful I’m tearing up as I listen.

At first I thought that what Martin did was hip-hop. But I got it backwards. What hip-hop does at its best is tap into a reservoir of improvisation that begins much earlier. Feel me? We’ve been attempting to imbue our values into the warp and woof of the American fabric since 1619. Hip-hop is just the latest attempt, and maybe not even the greatest.

My grandmother was, an Omni-American. And I honor her memory:

Sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us,
Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us,
Facing the rising sun of our new day begun
Let us march on till victory is won.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

I wish I had an answer that would pass muster. I don’t. I can, like Cobb did, pull from a list of my boys–good men all–and use that as some sort of barometer. The graduate chapter I’m active with had a picnic yesterday and there were all types of brothers there. No fights. No beefs. Good eats. Good drink. Omega Oil does the body good. In Baltimore a number of good black men can be found at the Que house, the Kappa house, the Sigma House (do they have one in bmore?), and in the Alpha national hq. You can also find a lot of them at the police department, at Druid Hill playing basketball during the weekends. I run into these brothers everywhere I go except Hopkins.

But I suspect this type of story is rote by now. You’d also find black men walking aimlessly, or hanging out on corners with a purpose. And with the number of formerly incarcerated persons back out on the streets increasing (and the rate of hiring decreasing) I suspect we’ll see a lot more doing this.

Perhaps the more interesting question to me is, what will “good black man” mean given the shifts we’re going through? $3.50 is a GREAT price for gas now, right?  

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

The gini coefficient measures income inequality within a group. A score of ’0′ represents perfect equality–everyone in the group makes the same amount of money. Here are gini coefficients for black and white families. 

Another measure that gets at the same phenomenon is here. The share of aggregate income broken down into fifths. If everything were equal each fifth would have a share of well…a fifth. We don’t see that in black communities. And again here are the equivalent rates for whites.

Notice anything? How do you think this is related to Obama’s speech on fatherhood yesterday?

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Too many fathers are M.I.A, too many fathers are AWOL, missing from too many lives and too many homes,” Mr. Obama said, to a chorus of approving murmurs from the audience. “They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men. And the foundations of our families are weaker because of it.

More here.

The term “striking” doesn’t come from me but from the New York Times. Thing is that others have delivered “striking” speeches like this. Bill Clinton comes immediately to mind. As does Bill Cosby. Listen closely to the Minister Louis Farrakhan and you hear the same thing. In fact, the pastor of my wife’s church delivered the same message. This is the “courageous speech” that among other things tells listeners–not the people in the audience but potential voters–that he isn’t black like that. That says he isn’t a knee jerk liberal willing to blame racism for the ailments of black men. He adds a canard or two about more job training–these speeches usually include SOMETHING. But that’s about it.

It makes me sick to my stomach every time I hear it. Every time I hear someone give it. Unfortunately, given today’s intellectual climate critics like me will only be “proven right” when the same economic crises hits everyone else…and dads go AWOL. But of course then it won’t be cultural.

These are the types of speeches that make me want to stay home come November.

Update. Racism Review has the best analysis of the speech I’ve read.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

But I just attended a graduation party. The young graduate’s older brother is a Morehouse man, and is going to transfer as soon as he can. Why? Because he isn’t comfortable with the growing number of gay men who have chosen to call Morehouse home. In 2002 Morehouse student Aaron Price beat fellow student Gregory Love with a baseball bat because Love peeked his head in the shower stall that Price was using. He received a sentence of ten years, but this sentence was recently reduced. In response to the attack on Love, Morehouse administrators have adopted at least one policy designed to re-establish “masculine norms”. Students now have to wear a maroon blazer every day. As this young brother writes, other policies have been considered. The frame of tolerance is a problem here–these men should not be simply tolerated but should be given the space needed to grow as men and as students. But to say this situation is complicated is to understate the reality.

I’ve spent some time on black campuses. And by the accepted visible presence of female same-sex couples our ideas are changing. But accepting (not tolerating, accepting) gay men represents another terrain entirely. Not just because of the current moral panic known as the “down low” phenomenon. But because of very conservative ideas about the normative role of black men in black communities, combined with ideas about the role of institutions like Morehouse–institutions that were tasked not just to serve black men, but to develop black men. And “develop” has a very specific political and social meaning here. To “develop” a black man means to prepare him to be ready to accept his role as head of the house, as father to black children, as husband to a (black) wife. 

From what I understand if a Morehouse Man marries a Spelman Woman, he can use Morehouse facilities for free. This is likely only one of the many institutional practices that embed ideas about development and gender within both Morehouse and Spelman. Other practices include recruiting tactics that emphasize (heterosexual) masculinity, and fundraising tactics among alumni that emphasize tradition–which by its very nature emphasizes heterosexual norms. 

How would you deal with this issue as a college administrator? As a heterosexual student? As a gay/bisexual student? As a parent? 

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

I am where I am because of the dual legacies they represent.

Although Malcolm X never engaged in the organizing work that Martin Luther King did, for a number of reasons, it is very difficult to talk not only about black nationalism but about the development of Black Studies without talking about Malcolm X. And of course Martin Luther King Jr. led the desegregation movement.

But both families were financially and mentally broken after their assassinations, signaling that neither King nor X thought much about what would happen to their families afterwards. The reason why the King family held on to King’s legacy and fought to be compensated for it was not because they were selfish, but rather because they needed the income. Neither Coretta nor Betty was ever able to really get over the deaths of their spouses because of who their spouses were and neither remarried.

I do not believe that the gains made because of their activities outweigh the damage caused to their individual families. Every action that movement folks participated in carried immense risk. But while King and X chose to bore the risks they took, their children did NOT. Further those risks could have been minimized, with either a different strategic approach that emphasized life rather than martyrdom, or at least with some type of planning.

I’d be interested in knowing your thoughts, particularly if you have children.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Click here to view the embedded video.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Click here to view the embedded video.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites