Dr. Lester K. Spence

The Future is Here
Subscribe

Archive for February, 2010

Why Does the NAACP Have a CEO?

February 24, 2010 By: The Good Doctor Category: black leadership Comments

Last Saturday the NAACP replaced longtime Chairman Julian Bond, naming health-care administrator Roslyn M. Brock as its chairman. Brock, 44, is, like President/CEO Benjamin Jealous the first such chairman to never have experienced legal segregation. I’m mildly surprised that there hasn’t been a bit more coverage on this news, but they made the move on a Saturday, which even in this age of 24-hour instantaneous news coverage is not necessarily a “good-look” news wise. You want to make a splash with something like this? Do it in the morning during the week.

But I digress.

So I’ve begun doing the research for my second book project (on neoliberalism in black politics) in earnest. The NAACP is one of the entities I am interested in studying, not just because they are the oldest and most venerable civil rights association, but because of two administrative moves made in 1977 and in 1996 respectively. In 1977 they changed the title of the Executive Secretary to the Executive Director/CEO. IN 1996 they eliminated the ELECTED office of President and established the title of President/CEO.

The latter move effectively takes away the ability to select a President from NAACP members at large, and to an extent from the 67-member National Board of Directors. The former move sounds like a simple name change–I don’t know whether any formal responsibilities changed–but I think it signals something a bit more. Different thoughts come to mind when we think of an “executive secretary” than come to mind when we think of an “executive director/ceo”. In fact, different thoughts come to mind when we think of an “executive director/CEO” than when we think of an “executive director.” Indeed, the very term “CEO” has become in some ways more powerful than “congressman” or “senator”.

I imagine that the reason both of these moves occurred was to bring the NAACP into the modern era of civil rights advocacy. But what does this mean exactly? What do we lose when we take the ability to elect a leader and replace that with an executive headhunting firm? I’d argue that this move is part and parcel of the neoliberal shift in black politics, the shift towards a corporate management approach to race relations and to black politics. And although the first NAACP leader with corporate experience (Bruce Gordon) was not chosen until 2005, it seems that the organization was moving towards this point much much earlier.

Thoughts are welcome.

White Space/Black Space

February 03, 2010 By: The Good Doctor Category: media Comments

This month The Urbanite is running an issue on “Race”. I was asked by the editor to write about the phenomenon of “self-segregation”. So rather than pen a piece about black kids deciding to sit all by themselves, I took another approach. I wrote a piece about the desirability of “black spaces”. Spaces black people can effectively “breathe” in. Of course it’s a bit more complicated than that. But I only had a couple of thousand words to work with. And on top of it I was able to take one of the worst days of 2008 (the first day of the Fall 2008 semester) and use it. Take a look and see what I mean.

A Discussion with Author of FROM REVOLUTIONARIES TO RACE LEADERS

February 01, 2010 By: The Good Doctor Category: black intellectuals Comments

About an hour before Obama’s State of the Union Address, I had the pleasure to deliver a keynote lecture at Hobart and William Smith College. My talk “Constructing Pookie: The Politics of the Black Male Crisis” was sponsored by The Fisher Center for the Study of Men and Women and was the first talk of their “Engendering Crisis” series. I’m going to put the video up later, but I had the chance to talk with the Director of the Center, Cedric Johnson. Cedric’s first book From Revolutionaries to Race Leaders unpacks the politics of the black power movement. It’s required reading for those trying to understand the politics of the post-civil rights era. He is one of my favorite scholars,because he’s deeply engaged in the politics of “black politics” and also in trying to create or at least begin to articulate what a new world should look like in doing so.

And besides that he’s “good people”.

We had the chance to sit down and talk Thursday before I flew back to Baltimore. I had the presence of mind to tape our one hour conversation. I edited it a little bit. Check it out. We talk about neoliberalism, parenting, the Academy, and the black male crisis, among other things. We don’t talk about his book, but maybe we will next time around.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes