Dr. Lester K. Spence

The Future is Here
Subscribe

Detroit is dead. Long Live Detroit!

December 17, 2008 By: The Good Doctor Category: Uncategorized

Detroit is the modern city. What we think of when we think of the modern urban condition (from relying on automobiles and freeways to drive, from using cities to house labor for factories, to stereotypes of crime and urban dysfunction) all happened in Detroit first. So goes Detroit, so goes urban America (and arguably the urban West/North). 

With that said, two stories of interest.

Detroit as a city was built for over 2 million people. Now less than 900,000 live within her borders. Over 30% of her land is unused. No wonder coyotes have been spotted roaming the city. Take a look at how Detroit compares to other major cities. Manhattan has 1.6 times as many residents in less than half of the space. Now we can look at this through the neoliberal lens and talk about waste and inefficiency…in fact this is the normal urban narrative right? Detroit is empty because it is dangerous, corrupt even. And with the economy the way it is, Detroiters able to actually sell their house at a profit, or at least at a mild loss, would do best to actually pick up stakes and leave.

 

I understand this viewpoint, but don’t take it myself. In fact I think it represents an opportunity to think about the city, and about cities in new and vibrant ways.

If you potentially had 89 square miles of empty land to use to serve the needs of the Detroit population, what would you use it for? What could you use it for?

…….

The second story?

The Detroit Free Press and the Detroit News have decided to go virtual. They will publish everyday but only deliver to homes on Thursday, Friday, and Sunday. Further they will devote much more of their resources to delivering news through their webpages. Hits on their webpage hover around 4 million per day, while their newspaper readership has declined. Their profits are still decent, but the costs of printing are becoming prohibitive. 

This is another cost-cutting measure that hamstrings a whole set of workers. Not only are paperboys/girls out of luck, but also out of luck are the distributors they work for. And then there are the craftsmen and women who work the printing machines. 

On the other hand though this theoretically leads to more innovative ways to deliver news. I shot some video over the holidays in Detroit with the thought of making a mini-documentary of sorts, and was approached about possibly letting the Free Press use some of it. 

Detroit as we know it is dead. But rather than performing an autopsy, we should await the new birth. What does the spirit of the twentieth century come back as?

The spirit of the twenty-first.

  • Interesting post. I have made a twitter post about this. My friends will enjoy reading it also.
  • What does the spirit of the twentieth century come back as?

    it doesn't....,

    what was it like in the 19th century?
  • tootsis
    Doc had a conversation with a journalist for Crain business week publication,his take on the freep and news latest ;is that neither tried to get better i.e. sell advertisement ,they waited for customer to materialize versus a proactive stand;an example is the obit column,haven't change in 177 years, no diversity,people of color don't buy obit adds?
  • tootsis
    Detroit I dare say has more potential than other urban area because of its population density,do I hear urban gardening,what about a new application of community architectonic, tear down cost will be minimal
  • ruh roh....,

    without a redo, that'll be the last time I try to paste some html source even if I take it from one of my own blogposts. The thought is twofold, however. First, there is the singular symbolic and functional place held within the American psyche by the automobile - so the demise of the hub of the automotive industry is singular.

    Second, and more to the point, if 70% of large enterprise software implementations fail due to poor change management and user acceptance (and these are just to automate existing business processes, not revolutionize a way of life) then what is the likelihood that the level of comprehensive change management required to transition Detroit from its terminal current state to a resurrected future state could be mounted, regardless of the level of local, regional and national engagement?
  • I have to consult google maps and then think about this rather hard before endeavoring an answer. Meanwhile, I offer the following placeholder to your assertion "so goes Detroit, so goes urban America....,"
    Amanda Kovattana goes straight to the heart of Orlov's treatment of our predicament, uncovering at least one of the fundamental assumptions inherent to being a fish in these American waters;
    Along the way, he reveals pithy insights to explain how the American system works in contrast with the Russian one. For instance the story of the classless society is exemplified by the concept of a middle class — something Americans have proudly espoused — which he points out is held together by the common denominator of everyone owning a car. That's right, not education, not equal opportunity, or equal rights but the one-ton behemoth that we must have to get around the wasteful geography created by suburbia.

    We know about this waste from the film The End of Suburbia and James Kunstler's Geography of Nowhere and all the other peak oil fellows, but Orlov points out that
    because we are so identified with owning a car as part of this American middle class identity we will be hard put to let it go. And when we are forced to (due to diminishing and increasingly expensive gasoline supplies) so will go the myth of the middle class. In turn he explains how the Russians lost faith in the classless worker's paradise because they could clearly see that there was an elite strutting around in cool Armani threads. Meanwhile the lack of consumer goods and trendy fashions meant that a good life for all never became a reality.

    And because our ideologically indoctrinated minds are so closed to such deep seated change and so invested in our "can do" innovation, we will, like Napoleon, be unable to retreat from the overextended, oil fueled, debt based economy which is poised to come crashing down, financed as it is by foreign investment that will eventually decide that we are not a good credit risk.
    And there it is in a nutshell. Few national politicians dare give voice to what's just beyond the signpost up ahead. Being unwilling and unable to discuss reality, how then could they ever go about proposing, much less implementing, any of the radical engineering redesigns required to genuinely rebuild along viable and sustainable lines? The patient is as yet utterly unwilling to hear an objective and accurate diagnosis. With no diagnosis, how can she participate in her own treatment, much less get on board with the radical measures required to effect an actual cure?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes